As investigators continue to examine the circumstances surrounding the shooting that occurred Thursday night in Fallston, additional public information has emerged regarding the property where the incident took place. Authorities have not indicated that the property’s ownership is connected to the shooting itself, but public records have drawn attention as the investigation remains active.
According to publicly available records, the residence at 2304 Willow Vale Drive is owned by Sharonda Ellerby, a well-known entrepreneur in the Baltimore area. Ellerby is associated with several business ventures, including Ellerby Enterprises, The Ellerby Tax Advisory Group, Qwik Tag & Title, and the Supreme Ballroom.
The home itself is a sizable property located in Fallston, Maryland. Public real estate records indicate that the residence spans more than 7,300 square feet and carries an estimated value of approximately $1.35 million. Since news of the shooting broke, the property has become a focus of public interest as authorities work to determine exactly what transpired.
Some Maryland residents may also recognize Ellerby’s name from her involvement in public policy discussions. In 2019, she appeared alongside Johnny Olszewski in support of the HOME Act, legislation designed to prevent housing discrimination based on a person’s lawful source of income, including the use of Section 8 housing vouchers.
During testimony supporting the measure, Ellerby spoke about her own experiences navigating housing challenges while using a voucher program before eventually becoming a successful business owner. She argued that the legislation would benefit veterans, seniors, individuals with disabilities, and other residents seeking fair access to housing opportunities.
Investigators continue to gather evidence and review information related to the shooting. Officials have emphasized that no connection has been established between Ellerby’s businesses, advocacy efforts, or public activities and the incident itself. At this stage, the information regarding the property’s ownership remains part of the broader background surrounding a case that is still under investigation.